[2026:JHHC:16673] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4339 of 2026 ------ Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Ray @ Pintu Yadav @ Randhir Kumar @ Pintu Mafiya, aged about 32 years, Son of Late Rajendra Prasad Yadav, resident of Lalji Tola, P.O. and P.s. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna (Bihar). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate. For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay. A.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-09-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 320 of 2025, arising out of Chas P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 110, 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(6), 111(7), 310(2), 310(4), 310(5), 310(6), 324(2), 324(5), 317(3) read with Section 190 of the B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)a/35, 25(6)/35, 25(7)/35, 26/35 and 27/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of dacoity in the jewelry shop of the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not been put to T.I.P. as mentioned in para-09 nor he is named in the F.I.R. On the basis of confession of the co-accused Karan Kumar Deva, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. So far as 04 witnesses have been examined, but none of the witnesses have identified the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegation has been admitted to bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 24.03.2026 in B.A. No.1226 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.09.2025 as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Bokaro in connection with S.T. Case No. 320 of 2025, arising out of Chas P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09/06/2026 Amar/