MOHAMMAD ZAHIR S/O SHRI MOHAMMAD AKIL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1299/2026 · 2026-01-24
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16113 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16113 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3362] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1299/2026 Mohammad Zahir S/o Shri Mohammad Akil, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mohalla Bisayatiram, Ward No. 12 Khandela, Police Station Khandela, District Sikar, Raj. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Sab Jail Neemkathana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Vahim (Uncle of petitioner) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.121/2025 registered at Police Station Khandela, District Sikar for offences under Sections 189(2), 121(1), 132 and 352 of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard Mr. Abdul Vahim (uncle of the petitioner) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. He submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that allegation levelled against the present petitioner is of causing the hurt to deter public servant from his duty. He further submits that due to a road accident, a mob had gathered at the spot. The police have implicated him on false and concocted grounds. Petitioner is behind the bars since
09.01.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time,
[2026:RJ-JP:3362] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1299/2026] therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mohammad Zahir S/o Shri Mohammad Akil, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/183