Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16110 (JHR)

SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/252/2026 · 2026-06-09

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:16487 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 252 of 2026 Shashi Bhushan Prasad ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 3. The Officer Incharge, Ramgarh 4. Rohit Prakash 5. Prabhakar Srivastava 6. Subodh Pandey 7. Arjun Pandey 8. Director, Mudra Finance Limited Company, Swawlanban Bhawan, C-11, G-Block, Bandra Kula Complex, Bandra, East Mumbai … Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. J.P. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Prakash, A.C. to S.C.-IV --- Order No. 05 Dated 9th June, 2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective sides. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondent No. 3 to institute a First Information Report against the respondents No. 4 to 8. At the outset, learned AC to S.C.-IV submits that a First Information Report has already been registered being Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 120 of 2026. The institution of the First Information Report has made the prayer in this writ application redundant and consequently, the same stands disposed of. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.) 09.06.2026 MK