2026:JHHC:16679 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.6110 of 2016 ------ 1. Braj Mohan Sharma 2. Vijay Kumar 3. Devidayal Prasad Singh 4. Ram Lakhan Prasad 5. Shubhash Chandra Sinha 6. Deena Nath Sharma 7. Birendra Nath Pandey 8. Jagmohan Thakur 9. Rambali Sharma 10. Ramashray Prasad Singh 11. Saroj Kumar 12. Chhabinath Prasad 13. Satish Kumar Pandey 14. Nawal Kishore Prasad Verma 15. Awadhesh Mishra 16. Shambhu Saran Pandey 17. Ram Binay Kumar …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 4. The Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. and P.S.- Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The State of Bihar. ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Sushant Kumar, A.C. to S.C.-II For Resp. No.4 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Advocate For Resp. No.5 : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, A.C. to G.A.(Bihar) ------ 06/Dated: 10.06.2026 1. None is present to represent the petitioners. 2. It appears from the order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court that when there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners, the following order was passed on that date: - 2026:JHHC:16679 2 “None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsels for the respondents are present. This case is of the year 2016. 2. Accordingly, with a view to give one more indulgence, list this case on 09.02.2026.” 3. Considering the reference of the order made at paragraph-2 of the order dated 30.01.2026 and in view of the fact that none is present today to represent the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 10.06.2026 Rohit/-