1 2026:CGHC:5207-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 49 of 2026 1 - Smt. Seema Tayal W/o Shri Sunil Tayal, aged about 55 Years R/o B- 65, VIP Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P.S. Khamardih, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Manju Pathak W/o Shri P.K. Pathak, aged about 54 years R/o B-64, VIP Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P.S. Khamardih, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Kavita Goyal W/o Shri Vikas Goyal, aged about 47 Years R/o B-67, VIP Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P.S. Khamardih, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellants versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Town and Country Planning, Indirawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, New Composite Building, Second Floor, Collector Parisar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - District Regularization Committee, through the Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Municipal Corporation Raipur, through the Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 6 - Pramila Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti, through the President, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Richa Devi Jadhavani, aged about 60 Years R/o B-59 and B- 60, Savitri Devi Complex, VIP Estate Colony, Vidhan Sabha Road, P.S. Khamardih, Tehsil and District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 /State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Swati Agrawal holding brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30 .01 .2026 1 Heard Mr. Prateek Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Ms. Swati Agrawal holding brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.5 and Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mayank Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.5. 2 By way of present writ appeal under Section 2 of Sub-Section (1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench Act, 3 2006, the appellants / writ petitioners have challenged the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPC No.718 of 2020, by which the writ petition filed by the petitioners has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge. The appellants are also challenging the order dated 03.12.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in REVP No. 400 of 2025, whereby the review petition filed by them has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge. 3 Learned counsel for the appellants submitted as the writ petitioners had not challenged the certificate issued by the District Regularization committee, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Zila, Raipur dated 08.12.2023, hence, the said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated 25.07.2025 and further the review petition filed by the petitioners has also been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide impugned order dated 03.12.2025. It is further submitted that though the petitioners were given liberty to revive their prayer, if new cause of action arises in near future, but, as the order which was ought to have been challenged could not have been challenged, hence, they wish to challenge the said order by means of a fresh petition, therefore, the observation made by the learned Single Judge that petitioners would be at liberty to revive their prayer, if new cause of action arises in near future, be not come in their way to challenge the said order. 4 4 Learned counsel, appearing for the private respondent has no objection to the same. 5 Accordingly the present appeal stands disposed of with liberty to the appellants to challenge the certificate dated 08.12.2023 issued by the District Regularization committee, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Zila, Raipur. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra