Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16107 (AP)

Bijivemula Pol Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/767/2026 · 2026-02-02

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010050072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 767/2026 Between: BIJIVEMULA POL REDDY, S/O.JAYA RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,R/O. RAMASWAMY PALLE VILLAGE,BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,THROUGH BADVEL U/G POLICE STATION,YSR KADAPA DISTRICTHIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE VICTIM, THE VICTIM ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 Dated 03.02.2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash the docket order dated 14.10.2025 passed in S.C.(POCSO).No.185 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judge, Special Court for Trail of Offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Kadapa, in Cr.No.06 of 2021 on the file of the Badvel U/G Police Station, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 366(A), 354(D), 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘the IPC’), Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.2 is that he is a friend of the junior paternal uncle of the victim, who has given some money to Accused No.1, with whom the victim is alleged to have eloped. The age of the victim at the time of the alleged offence was 14 years. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner/Accused No.2 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 Dated 03.02.2026 shall appear before the learned Magistrate within a period of one week from this date. On such appearance, the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against petitioner/Accused No.2 shall stand cancelled. It is made clear that the petitioner/Accused No.2 shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every adjournment without fail. 5. With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is disposed of As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.02.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 Dated 03.02.2026 35 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 767 of 2026 Date: 03.02.2026 RSI 5 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 Dated 03.02.2026 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No: Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 01. 03.02.2026 Dr.YLR,J I.A.No.01 of 2026 Heard. Dispensed with for the present. _________ Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.767 of 2026 The Criminal Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order). _________ Dr.YLR,J RSI