[2026:RJ-JP:3484] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1424/2026 Ravi Prakash Son Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Kuchhal, Resident Of B-5, Vinoba Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, Indira Circle, JLN Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pallavi Mehta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 27/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that in the interest of justice, Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and;- (i) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, the impugned order dated 16.04.2025 passed by the Learned Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur may kindly be quashed and set aside; (ii) by an appropriate writ, order or directions, Jaipur Development Authority may be directed to grant equal land of same value in lieu of 1210.78 square yards of land as per order/circular date 30.07.2015 of State Government; (iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may consider just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner; (iv) Cost of this Writ petition may also kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner." 2. After arguing the matter at some length, upon instructions of his client, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the petitioner's representation [2026:RJ-JP:3484] (2 of 2) [CW-1424/2026] dated 13.10.2025 seeking equal land of the same value in lieu of 1210.78 square yards of land is adjudicated upon by the Jaipur Development Authority, expeditiously, preferably in a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1-JDA to decide petitioner's representation dated 13.10.2025, preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of filing of the copy of this order, by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J RAHUL/SOURAV /7