Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16103 (BOM)

LAXMAN RAOSAHEB KADAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/17303/2022 · 2026-09-29

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 957- C.A. 17303-2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17303 OF 2022 IN CP/150/2022 LAXMAN RAOSAHEB KADAM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ….. Advocate for Applicant : Adv. S. F. Bankar h/f Mr. P. A. Kulkarni AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare ...... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 ORDER 1. Heard. 2. By way of this application, the applicant wants to restore his Contempt Petition No. 150 of 2022, which was dismissed for non removal of office objections pursuant to the order dated 11.07.2022. The applicant has also prayed for condonation of delay of 103 days in filing this application. There is no strong objection from other side, therefore, considering the reasons stated in the application, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (C), subject to condition that the applicant shall remove all the office objections within a period of two weeks from today. (2) 957- C.A. 17303-2022.odt 3. The application is accordingly disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/