Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16103 (ALL)

RAJU PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/22695/2026 · 2026-10-06

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22695 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to make fair and proper investigation against the accused persons in pursuance of the FIR dated 06.05.2026 in Case Crime No. 41 of 2026, under Sections 310(2), 190, 193(2), 110, 115(2) BNS, Police Station Kathela Sarai Mata, District Siddharth Nagar (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition). ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to arrest the accused persons/respondent no.4 to 7 in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 06.05.2026 in Case Crime No. 41 of 2026, under Sections 310(2), 190, 193(2), 110, 115(2) BNS, Police Station Kathela Sarai Mata, District Siddharth Nagar." 2. Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned AGA submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 02.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Kumar Chaudhary, Kamlesh Shrama Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raju Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) forum. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- respondents. 5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet on 02.08.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22695 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad