Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.960 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- East Champaran ====================================================== Munna Singh Son of Surendra Singh R/o Village - Gaji Kamtaul, Ward No. 5, P.S. - Kurdhani, District - Muzaffarpur.(Wrongly given the name of district as east Champaran in the Impugned order). ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sanjay Kumar Paswan Son of Indradeo Paswan R/o Vill. Chailahan, P.S. - Banjariya, Dist. - East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 20-05-2026 Heard the parties through virtual mode.
2. The present appeal has been preferred:
“against the order dated 29.01.2026 passed in Α.Β.Ρ. No-5664/2025, whereby and whereunder the Anticipatory Bail of the appellant has been rejected in connection with Motihari SC/ST P.S. Case No- 87/2025 dated 08.09.2025 under section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. and section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (P.O.A.) Act passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge SC/ST Act, East
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.960 of 2026(3) dt.20-05-2026 2/2 Champaran Motihari as well as for grant of Anticipatory Bail to the appellant.”
3. It has been informed by learned counsel for the appellant that during the pendency of appeal the appellant stands arrested and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T