- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7901 MFA No. 4807 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4807 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT TULASI W/O K. RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 71, 4TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS, SRINIVASANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560 050. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANANTHA S.G., ADVOCATE) AND: D.PHILIP RAJ S/O R.M. DASS, R/A NO. 65, 2ND FLOOR, 20TH MAIN, MARNAHALLI, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560040 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MURTHY D.L., ADVOCATE) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 104 READ WITH SECTION 151 AND ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7901 MFA No. 4807 of 2020 JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. 2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 05.02.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 10.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the appellant on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3 As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7901 MFA No. 4807 of 2020 Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43