[2026:JHHC:16652] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2987 of 2026 Preeti Mishra alias Priti Mishra @ Preeti Kumari, aged about 32 years, D/o Late Prakash Mishra, Resident of 157, Apna Market, Jainamore, P.O. Bandhdih, P.S.- Jaridih, District Bokaro. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Trishna Sagar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 10.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 97 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. No. 1202 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 306 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations are made that the daughter of the informant has committed suicide. She next submits that the petitioner was residing at Bengaluru and only because she has talked with the deceased, she has been falsely implicated in this case. She further submits that petitioner has not sent up for trial, however, the learned court after differing with the final form, has taken the cognizance against the petitioner. She then submits that in the final form, it has come that the due to misconception, the present case has been lodged. She also submits that the other co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 1899 of 2026 by this court. [2026:JHHC:16652] -2- 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there that the petitioner has talked with the deceased. 5. Considering that only allegation is made against the petitioner of talking with the deceased on phone, however, what role played by the petitioner to instigate the deceased to take such steps is not disclosed in the FIR and even in the order taking cognizance and further the learned court after differing with the final form has taken the cognizance and the other co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. by this court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of her surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro, in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 97 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. No. 1202 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-10.06.2026 Amitesh/-