Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16100 (ALL)

TEJVEER v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34375/2026 · 2026-10-06

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34375 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ram Raj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A.K. Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 195 of 2025, under Sections 80(2) and 85 BNS and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bulandshahr, during the pendency of trial. 4. This is the second bail application filed on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 5.8.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 26799 of 2025. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that subsequent to the said rejection order, P.W. 1 and 2 have been examined during trial and they have completely resiled from their earlier statements and have been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring them hostile and that P.W.3 has also not supported the prosecution story and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Tejveer, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Raj Pandey, Shubham Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tejveer .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any of the above condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observation herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 7, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 34375 of 2026 2 Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad