[2026:RJ-JP:3149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1241/2026 Mukesh S/o Shri Khyaliram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Fulwada, P.s. Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Presently In Sub Jail At Gangapur City, District Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Sharma Mr. Akshat Sharma Mr. Anoop Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. Mr. Mahendra Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.26/2025 registered at Police Station Batoda, District Gangapur City for offence under Section 108 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also learned counsel for the complainant. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he was charging a very high rate of interest for the money given by him to the brother of the complainant and in view of charging high rate of interest, the brother of the complainant has committed suicide. [2026:RJ-JP:3149] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1241/2026] 5. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in this criminal case with false and fabricated facts so as to create pressure upon the accused-petitioner for not demanding money which he has given to the family of the complainant. 6. It is further submitted that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2025. It is also submitted that trial of the case will take considerable time. 7. It is also submitted that the co-accused namely Vijay S/o Shri Devpal and Vinod Kumar @ Pintu S/o Shri Ramesh Chand and Hukum Singh @ Hukamchand have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the present case of the accused-petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of co-accused. 8. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel fro the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and considering the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet in the matter and the accused- petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2025 and also the fact that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 10. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in [2026:RJ-JP:3149] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1241/2026] the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /8