Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16095 (HP)

LAND ACQUSITION COLLECTOR HPPWD AND OTHERS v. OM PRAKASH AND OTHERS

CMP.M/880/2026 · 2026-07-20

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LAC & Ors. Vs. Om Prakash & Ors. CMP(M) No. 880/2026 20.07.2026 Present: Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for the applicants/appellants. Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents. CMP(M) No. 880/2026 Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of Superintending Engineer, NH Circle, HPPWD Shimla, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. RFA No. /2026 Heard. Admit. Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate, accepts service of post admission notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file Power of Attorney. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of learned Court below be called for. CMPST No. 30535/2026 Heard. Subject to deposit of entire award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, within a period of four weeks, the operation and execution of impugned award dated 10.09.2025, passed by learned Additional District Judge Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., in Reference Petition No. 35-NL/4 of 2019(17), titled as Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. LAC, HPPWD & Ors., shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 20th July, 2026 (raman)