1 2026:CGHC:5250-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 90 of 2017 1 - Ramesh S/o Shri Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Bhadesar Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Defendants 2 - Indira Bai D/o Shri Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 57 Years W/o Shri Shatrughan Prasad Sahu, R/o Village Bharda Lawan, District- Baloda- Bazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Indumati D/o Shri Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 53 Years W/o Shri Yashpal Sahu, R/o Village Pali Ratanpur, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Hemant Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Dhadesar, Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Siya Bai Wd/o Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 67 Years R/o Village Bhadesar, Tahsil Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Onkar Dutt S/o Shri Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 48 Years Caste Sahu, Village Bhadesar, Tahsil Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Plaintiff 2 - Rati Devi W/o Bansal Singh Caste Chhatriya, R/o Sandeep Medical SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.01.31 10:48:18 +0530 2 Store Bhadesar, Tahsil Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh Defendants 3 - Lalit Kumar S/o Shri Mohanlal Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bahdesar, Tahsil Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh At Present R/o Deepka Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh, Defendants 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Appellants : None For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Somnath Verma, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 30/01/2026 1. The present case was listed on 05/01/2026, however no one was appeared on behalf of the appellants. Today again the case is listed for hearing but none appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal, on repeated calls. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellants have lost interest in pursuing the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar