Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16095 (AP)

Matta Surya Roa v. The Project Officer and Addtional Agent to Government

WP/12085/2009 · 2026-02-02

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010052092009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12085/2009 Between: 1. MATTA SURYA ROA, S/O.ARAVALA RAJU CULTIVATION GANGAVARAM (V) AND (M) EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. MATTA NAGU@ NAGA RAJU, GANI RAJU,HINDU CULTIVATION GANGAVARAM(V) &(M) EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. MATTA RAJU, S/O. GANI RAJU, HINDU CULTIVATION GANGAVARAM (V) &(M) E.G DISTRICT 4. MATTA VEERAJU, S/O. ARAVALARAJU,HINDU CULTIVATION GANGAVARAM (V) &(M) E.G DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE PROJECT OFFICER AND ADDTIONAL AGENT TO GOVERNMENT, I.T.D.A RAMAPACHODAVARAM,E.G DISTRICT 2. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, GANGAVARAM(M) E.G DISTRICT 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, RAMACHODAVARAM,E.G 2 DISTRICT 4. MADAKAM RAMU, S/O LATE KANNAYYA,HINDU MAJOR,CULTIVATION ANUKULAPALEM(V) ADDATEEGALA(M) E.G DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus declaring that the proceedure in C.M.A No.80 of 2008 as illegal arbitrary and barred by rejudicata and for consequential direction directing the respondents not to initiate any proceedings against the petitioners with regard to the land admeaduring Ac.39-44 cents in Sy No.178 situated at Gngavaram (V) and (M) East Godavari District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 15585 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to evict the petitioners from this land admeasuring Ac 39-44 cents in S.No.178 situated at Gangavaram(V) &(M) E.G District pending disposal of the wp and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. . 2. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.12085 of 2009 ORDER: Learned counsel for the Petitioner(s) submits that in view of further developments, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 03.02.2026 chs 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 53 W.P.No.12085 of 2009 Date: 03.02.2026 chs