Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16093 (KAR)

SMT. ZAREENA BEGUM v. THE HOTEL INDUSTRIALISTS CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/38483/2025 · 2026-02-23

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11311 WP No. 38483 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 38483 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. ZAREENA BEGUM WIFE OF LATE SIRAJ, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 304, AGJB RESIDENCY, NO. 18, 3RD CROSS, RAHAMATHNAGAR, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560032 …PETITIONER (BY MS. FARHEEN.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE HOTEL INDUSTRIALISTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD REGISTERED OFFICE AT: SAHAKARASOURABHA, NO.234, 2ND CROSS, 4TH MAIN, CHAMARAJAPET, BANGALORE-560 018. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR.K.SHYAMSUNDAR AITHAL Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11311 WP No. 38483 of 2025 2. MR. ABDUL KHALEEL SON OF LATE ABDUL GAFFAR, RESIDENT OF NO.83, 3RD CROSS, KAVALBYRASANDRA NEW EXTENSION, BANGALORE - 560 032. 3. MR.ABDUL HAFI, SON OF LATE ABDUL GAFFAR, RESIDENT OF HABIB RESIDENCY, NO.43, 2ND CROSS, P & T COLONY, R.T NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K V LOKESH, ADV., FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.1, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, OR ANYONE CLAIMING THROUH OR UNDER IT, NOT TO DISPOSSESS THE PETITIONER FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11311 WP No. 38483 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Ms Farheen, the learned counsel for the petitioner, files a memo for withdrawal dated 23.02.2026 and for return of the original Lease Agreement dated 14.09.2023 produced at Annexure-A to the petition. The learned counsel submits that this memo is filed because the dispute is settled between them. The memo is accepted, and the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn directing the Registry to return the original lease agreement dated 14.09.2023 to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25