Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1609 (JK)

ARSHID AHMAD GANAIE v. MOHAMMAD ABDULLAH SOFI

CRM(M)/402/2026 · 2026-07-01

Shahzad Azeem

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 17 Supp.3 Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M)/402/2026 Arshid Ahmad Ganaie …Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Lone Altaf, Advocate. V/s Mohammad Abdullah Sofi … Respondent(s) Through: - None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE. (ORDER) 01.07.2026 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the liberty to avail the remedy of revision before the Court of learned Sessions Court. He further prays that in case the petitioner approaches the Revisional Court, the question of limitation may not come in his way. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The Revisional Court while considering the question of limitation shall exclude the time consumed by the petitioner during the pendency of this petition before this Court. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) JUDGE SRINAGAR July 1st, 2026 Shoaib Javid