Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16085 (RAJ)

SONU SINGH S/O VIJAY SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1097/2026 · 2026-01-22

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2905] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1097/2026 Sonu Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Shivaji Park, Kharwas Kachchi Basti, Alwar, Police Station Shivaji Park, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.158/2025 registered at Police Station Malpura, District-Tonk for offences under Sections 331(4) and 305(e) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is only with regard to the alleged theft of ATM in which amount of Rs.12,77,000/- was lying. He submits that there is no allegation of forgery in the FIR and that the police have impleaded the above offence only to exaggerate the gravity of the present case on false and concocted grounds. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.09.2025. Charge- [2026:RJ-JP:2905] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1097/2026] sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sonu Singh S/o Vijay Singh shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/163