1 / 2 2026:CGHC:5169 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1162 of 2026 • Harinath Netam S/o Hiralal Netam Aged About 50 Years R/o Sika Sar Dam, Near Government Colony, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. The Engineer-In-Chief Water Resource Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector - 19, Capital Complex Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. The Executive Engineer (Medical/ Engineering), Light Machinery, Tubewell And Gate Division, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 6. The Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Divisional Office, Raipur Division, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Gunjan Rani Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 30/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees, is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners therein have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and are only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioners, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submits representation, his claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE