1 917 cra.117.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 917 CRA NO. 117 OF 2026 PRAVIN BAPU KANGUDE (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. MANJUSHRI PRAVIN KANGUDE AND ANOTHER VERSUS SAHYOG SAHAKARI GRUHA NIRMAN SANSTHA MARYADIT, NEWASA KHURD, THROUGH MURLIDHAR N. KARALE ... Advocate for the Applicants : Mr. Pathan Yunus Basheer. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 29th September, 2026. P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicants / original defendants. 2 Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the ground raised for rejection of the plaint is the deficit court fee. He further submits that the learned Trial Court has not given direction to the plaintiff to pay the deficit court fees, and the application has been rejected. 3 Considering peculiar set of facts of this case, it would be proper to consider the submission of the applicants / defendants that deficit court fees is paid or not. If it is not paid, then the learned Trial Court can suo-motu decide by giving direction to the respondent / plaintiff to pay the deficit court fees. 2026:BHC-AUG:46132 2 917 cra.117.26.odt 4 The learned Trial Court is expected to decide this issue and if the directions are not followed, then the applicants / defendants are at liberty to file an application for rejection of the plaint. 5 With this, the civil revision application is disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga