Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16081 (RAJ)

VINOD S/O RANVEER v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1225/2026 · 2026-01-23

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1225/2026 1. Vinod S/o Ranveer, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhawanipura/bangamata/ramnagar Kanjar Colony, Police Station Sadar District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At District Jail Bundi) 2. Mevaram S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Ramnagar Kanjar Colony, Police Station Sadar District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At District Jail Bundi) 3. Sukendra S/o Jaiprakash, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ramnagar Kanjar Colony, Police Station Sadar District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Laddha For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. Ms. Rekha Arora HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.445/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for offence under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 17.12.2025. Police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. [2026:RJ-JP:3137] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1225/2026] 3. He further submits that both the parties have entered into a compromise and the accused-petitioners have made the payment of the alleged amount to the complainant. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant verified the fact of compromising in between the parties and states that the complainant has received amount of Rs. 5 lacs from the accused. 5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact of compromise between the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /6