- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10567-DB CCC No. 1353 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1353 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.A. DEVARAJ S/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO. G-3 RAIN TREE APARTMENT NO.9, GURUMURTHY STREET HALSURU, BENGALURU - 560 008 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI K. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VISHWANATH V.R. FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT MAJOR IN AGE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009 2. SHASHIDHAR MADYAL FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT MAJOR IN AGE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL - 562 106 …ACCUSED Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10567-DB CCC No. 1353 of 2025 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS REVENUE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 …PRO FORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HIS WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT VIDE ORDER DATED 25.06.2025, PASSED IN W.P.NO.18250/2025 (KLR- RES) PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 25.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.18250/2025 (KLR-RES), whereby the accused [Tahsildar] was directed to consider the representation dated 16.06.2025 at the earliest. The Assistant Commissioner was also directed to conclude the entire proceedings in a time bound manner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10567-DB CCC No. 1353 of 2025 2. Accused No.1 has filed an affidavit of compliance. The said affidavit indicates that the proceedings had been concluded. 3. In view of the above, we do not consider it apposite to initiate any proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Further, we clarify that this order will not preclude the complainant from availing all substantive remedies, if any, in accordance with law. 4. The complaint is, accordingly, closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2