RUSHIKESH SUNIL DHAVAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
ABA/1696/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16074 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16074 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1696 OF 2026 RUSHIKESH SUNIL DHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for Applicant (through VC) Mr. S. P. Joshi, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 7th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. After hearing the learned Advocates for both sides, and when this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief to the Applicant, the learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
2. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 937 ABA 1696.2026.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:47019