Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16072 (CHH)

ABHISHEK VAISHNAV v. SMT. ASHA ABHISHEK VAISHNAV

CRR/1177/2024 · 2026-01-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5585 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1177 of 2024 Abhishek Vaishnav R/o Shriram Nagar, T.V. Tower, Street 5 Shankar Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) Aged About 36 Years T.V. Tower, Street 5 Shankar Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus Smt. Asha Abhishek Vaishnav W/o Abhishek Vaishnav Aged About 36 Years R/o G- 8a, Street No. 05 Shriram Nagar, Near T.V.Tower, Shankar Nagar , Tehsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Ms. Juhi Anguriya, Advocate. For Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 31.01.2026 1. Heard Ms. Juhi Anguriya, learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent. 2. The present revision has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: “ It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dt. 22.04.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 524/2019 in the ends of justice. ” 3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry. 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 of 76 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 03/2024, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 76 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 03/2024 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar