Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1607 (RAJ)

RAJESH @ RAJKESH S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4366/2026 · 2026-03-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4366/2026 1. Rajesh @ Rajkesh S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Rondkala, Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.). (Presently Confined At District Jail Karauli). 2. Ajabsingh S/o Shri Nemprakash, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Rondkala, Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.). (Presently Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.1/2026 registered at Police Station Karauli Sadar, District Karauli for offences under Sections 189(2), 109(1), 125 and 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. No specific act has been attributed to the present petitioners in the FIR itself. In the statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS of the complainant as well as the injured, the specific role has been assigned to the co-accused-Avdesh, Rajkesh and Balveer, and not [2026:RJ-JP:12939] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4366/2026] to the present petitioners. Petitioners are behind the bars since 02.02.2026 with one criminal antecedents reported against the petitioner-Ajabsingh and petitioner-Rajesh @ Rajkesh has no criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Rajesh @ Rajkesh S/o Shri Omprakash and Ajabsingh S/o Shri Nemprakash, be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/77