SALEHA BEGUM LASKAR v. NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS AND 2 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/658/2024 · 2026-10-06
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16064 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16064 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010252932024
2026:GAU-AS:15083
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/658/2024 SALEHA BEGUM LASKAR W/O MD SAIFUDDIN LASKAR, R/O VILLAGE AND P.O. GANIGRAM, P.S.
KATIGORAH, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR, IAS AND 2 ORS.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, CUM I/C COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM 2:SMTI MAMATA HOJAI AES THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 CUM CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 3:GANESH HARIJAN INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS CACHAR DISTRICT CIRCLE CACHAR SILCHAR CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION CACHAR SILCHA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F U BARBHUIYA, MS S DAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1), MR. U SARMA (R-2),MS N M SARMA(R- 1),MR S M T CHISTIE(R-1,3)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 07-10-2026 Heard Mr. F. U. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. U. Sharma, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor, by placing the copy of the order dated 06.10.2026, passed by the Director, Secondary Education Department, Assam, submits that the order dated 16.06.2023, passed in WP(C) No. 2428/2016, has duly been complied with, as the case of the petitioner has been considered by the competent authority and the same was rejected on the ground that the petitioner does not possess the requisite qualification of Diploma in Assamese Typewriting.
Perusal of the order dated 06.10.2026 reflects that the order of this Court dated 16.06.2023 has been duly complied with.
Accordingly, contempt petition stands closed.
However, it is observed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps, in accordance with law, for challenging the order dated 06.10.2026, if so aggrieved.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant