Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16062 (JHR)

ANUJ TIWARI ALIAS ANUJ KUMAR TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4275/2026 · 2026-06-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:16515] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4275 of 2026 Anuj Tiwari @ Anuj Kumar Tiwari, aged about 35 years, S/o Vidharthi Tiwari, R/o Village. Hashker, P.O. and P.S. Garhwa, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Saman Anand , Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava , Addl.. PP 02 / 09.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 403 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 84/2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 308(4), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of Arms Act . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no one has been injured in the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.09.2025, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 403 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 84/2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 09.06.2026 Smita/-