Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:29389 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No.408 of 2026
Decided on: 17th July, 2026
Dharam Prakash
....Petitioner
versus
HPTDC and others
...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the judgment dated 28.05.2025 passed in CWP No.8879 of 2025, titled, Dharam Prakash vs. HPTDC and others has been complied with except the payment of revised arrears.
2.
In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition at this stage, in view of the fact that the respondents- Corporation has filed a review petition in CWP No.4427 of 2023, titled, Tulsi Ram vs. HPTDCL and Ors., which is still pending adjudication and the liberty may be granted to the
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2026:HHC:29389 ) 2
petitioner to file a fresh execution petition after the decision of the review petition.
3.
In view of this, the present petition is disposed of as having been closed, with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 17th July, 2026
Judge (naveen)