Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16061 (CAL)

PHANIBHUSHAN MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/35/2026 · 2026-02-20

Chaitali Chatterjee Das, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 20.02.2026 31 Saikat Mukherjee WPA(P)/35/2026 PHANIBHUSHAN MANDAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Ramdulal Manna, Adv. Ms. Manju Manna (Dey), Adv. Mr. Sayan Mukherjee, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Jaharlal De, A.G.P. Ms. Sukla Das Chandra, Adv. …For the State Mr. S.E. Huda, Adv. Mr. Sk. Aptabuddin, Adv. Ms. Nabeela Akbar, Adv. …For the Respondent No.11 Per, Sujoy Paul, CJ. 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned counsel. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a properly constituted petition. 3. The other side has no objection. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. [SUJOY PAUL, CJ.] [CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.]