Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16060 (ALL)

RAJ KISHOR RASTOGI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/29531/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29531 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Instructions filed by the learned Standing Counsel in Court today are taken on record. 2. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, submits that the three members committee has already submitted a report and, therefore, the relief as prayed for in the present petition stood satisfied. 3. In view of the above, the present petition has rendered infructuous and it is, accordingly, consigned to records. October 7, 2026 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Namman Raj Vanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Devansh Misra, Shiv Shanker Pandey (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Raj Kishor Rastogi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad