Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16053 (JHR)

GAUTAM SAGAR RANA @ GAUTAM RANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5064/2026 · 2026-06-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:16690] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5064 of 2026 ------ Gautam Sagar Rana @ Gautam Rana, aged about 25 years son of Rajendra Rana, resident of village- Rajaraidih, P.O. & P.S.- Markacho, District- Koderma .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-10-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.06 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No.187 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed the murder of the husband of the informant namely Subhash Rana. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 11 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his own confessional statement and suspicion. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.01.2026 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.06 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No.187 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-10.06.2026-Animesh/