THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS v. JAYANTA NEOG AND 13 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/2938/2025 · 2026-10-07
Kaushik Goswami
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16052 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16052 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/7 GAHC010173112026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2938/2025 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPTT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2: THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781022. 3: THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL TINSUKIA DISTRICT CIRCLE TINSUKIA DISTRICT DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM. 4: THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL MARGHERITA CIRCLE MARGHERITA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM. 5: THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL DOOMDOOMA CIRCLE DOOMDOOMA DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM. VERSUS JAYANTA NEOG AND 13 ORS S/O BHUBAN CH. NEOG R/O LAIPULI KAPTANCHUK
Page No.# 2/7 P.O. LAIPULI (PANITULA) DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN 786183 2:KESHAB BEZBORUAH S/O- LATE INDESWAR BEZBORUAH
R/O- NO. 1 UPAN UBAN
P.O.- KAKOPATHAR
P.S.- KAKOPATHAR
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. 3:MD. ALIP KHAN S/O- MOHAMDDIN KHAN
R/O- NO. 1 CHELLENGURI
P.O.- KAKOPATHAR
P.S.- KAKOPATHAR
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. 4:PRANJAL KUMAR GOHAIN S/O- LATE MADRAJIT GOHAIN
R/O- PANITOLA BORDUBI ROAD
P.O.- PANITOLA
P.S.- PANITOLA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786183. 5:SANGITA BORKAKOTY
Page No.# 3/7 D/O- PRAFULLA BORKAKOTY
R/O- AZAD ROAD DOOMDOOMA
P.O.- DOOMDOOMA
P.S.- DOOMDOOMA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786151. 6:JYOTI MORAN NEOG W/O- PHOTICK CHANDRA NEOG
R/O- A.T. ROAD NEAR CITY DHABA LAIPULI
P.O.- PANITOLA P.S.- PANITOLA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786183. 7:JAYANTA BORUAH S/O- LATE CHAKRADHAR BORUAH
R/O- SANTIPUR
P.O.- KAKOPATHAR
P.S.- KAKOPATHAR
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. 8:DHIRAJ THAPA S/O- LATE NARADHAJA THAPA
R/O- BORBIL NO. 1 JYOTI NAGAR P.O.- DIGBOI
Page No.# 4/7
P.S.- DIGBOI
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786171. 9:NABANITA NEOG D/O- LATE PABAN KR. NEOG
R/O- GUIJAN 5 NO. P.O.- RANGAGORAH
P.S.- GUIJAN
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786181. 10:GAYATRI CHOWDHURY D/O- PARAMANANDA CHOWDHURY
R/O- JOYANAGAR
P.O.- MARGHERITA
P.S.- MARGHERITA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786181. 11:RAJ MORAN S/O- MRINAL KANTA MORAN
R/O- KHERIJAN
P.O.- KAKOPATHAR
P.S.- KAKOPATHAR
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. Page No.# 5/7 12:NOBUL KUMAR SONOWAL S/O- LATE JAGANNATH SONOWAL
R/O- TENGAGAON TALAP
P.O.- TALAP
P.S.- DOOMDOOMA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786156. 13:DEBEN CH. CHETIA S/O- LATE HARINATH CHETIA
R/O- KAKOPATHAR
P.O.- KAKOPATHAR
P.S.- DOOMDOOMA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. 14:HEM CHANDRA MORAN S/O- LATE DIMBESWAR MORAN
R/O- SOONJAN
P.O.- NAVAJYOTI
P.S.- BORDUMSA
DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSAM
PIN- 786152. ------------ For the Applicant(s) : Ms. R. Barua, Standing Counsel, Department of School Education. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Gogoi, Advocate.
Page No.# 6/7 -BEFORE- HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
08.10.2026 (K. Goswami, J)
We have heard Ms. R. Barua, learned Standing Counsel, Department of School Education for the applicants and Mr. D. Gogoi,
learned Counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14.
2. By way of this interlocutory application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the applicant seeks condonation of the delay of 108 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and
order dated 11.04.2025, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No.4205/2024.
3. The delay of 108 days is attributed to the time consumed in the administrative and procedural processes following the Judgment and
Order dated 11.04.2025. The matter was examined at various levels, instructions were issued to prefer an appeal, relevant records were collected, and the draft writ appeal underwent preparation, vetting, verification, and approval by the concerned authorities. The appeal was ultimately filed on 26.08.2025.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that there has been no intentional or willful negligence on the part of the applicants in filing the connected appeal and, hence, prays for a liberal
consideration by this Court.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has fairly submitted
Page No.# 7/7 that he has received no instructions to oppose to the prayer for condonation of delay.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the averments in the application, we are satisfied that the applicants have sufficiently explained the delay. The chronology of events discloses sufficient cause, and there is nothing to suggest that the delay was deliberate, mala fide, or due to gross negligence.
7. That being so, the delay of 108 days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
8. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed off.
9. Registry to process the connected appeal and list the same on 16.11.2026 under the appropriate heading along with WA No. 305/2026.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant