KARAN NEHLANI @ DELU S/O LATE SHRI DINESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1307/2026 · 2026-01-24
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16051 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3367] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1307/2026 Karan Nehlani @ Delu S/o Late Shri Dinesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o House No. 29/129, Karunda Colony, Pratap Nagar, P.s. Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Heena (mother of petitioner) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 24/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.400/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard Ms. Heena (mother of the petitioner) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Ms. Heena states that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. She further submits that the petitioner has arrived at a compromise with the injured. Although twelve cases have been reported against the petitioner as criminal antecedents but he is bailed out in all the cases. She also undertakes before this Court that her son will not repeat such offence again. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.11.2025. The trial of the
[2026:RJ-JP:3367] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1307/2026] case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Karan Nehlani @ Delu S/o Late Shri Dinesh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as
directed above, the concerned SHO is
[2026:RJ-JP:3367] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1307/2026]
directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/186