SHYAM MURARY LAROIYA v. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR
Cont.(Cvl)/990/2016 · 2026-06-10
Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16048 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16048 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16695
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. (Cvl.) Case No.990 of 2016
------ Shyam Murary Laroiya son of Chandrawali Laroiya, resident of New Teachers Colony, P.O. and P.S. Nawanshahar, Punjab.
…. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Mr. P.K. Choudhari, the Regional Commissioner, D-11, Coal Mines Provident Fund, Region Dhanbad, Post Office and Police Station Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad-82600 (Jharkhand)
..... .... Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Advocate
For the BCCL : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate
Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Malviya, Advocate
For the CMPF : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Karbir, Advocate
------
10/Dated: 10.06.2026
1. Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the CMPF has submitted by referring to various paragraphs of the show cause that the differences amount of the statutory interest has already been paid.
2. The aforesaid fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Similar is the stand of the BCCL, who is being represented by Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, learned counsel.
4. Considering the same, this Court is of the view that since the
order has already been complied with, therefore, there is no need to proceed further.
5. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
10.06.2026-Rohit/-