JULEE @ BRIJMOHAN S/O GHANSHYAM v. RAGHUNANDAN S/O SH. LAXMAN DAS
CW/1440/2026 · 2026-01-27
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16047 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16047 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1440/2026 Julee @ Brijmohan S/o Ghanshyam, R/o Bargma Mod Hindauncity, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Raghunandan S/o Sh. Laxman Das, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.)
2. Radheyshyam S/o Sh. Ramratan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Chobepada, Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.)
3. Smt. Aruna Devi W/o Sh. Ghanshyam, R/o Hindauncity, District Karauli (Raj.)
4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Hindauncity, District Karauli (Raj.)
5. Sub Registrar, Tehsil Hindauncity, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Sharma with Ms. Manju Chouhan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 27/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 19.08.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge No.2, Hindaun City, District Karauli, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for being impleaded as party in the suit for cancellation of the adoption deed dated 18.09.1995, has been rejected.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present petitioner is the son of Smt. Aruna Devi who is already defendant- respondent No.2 in the suit and states that the rights of the
[2026:RJ-JP:3631] (2 of 2) [CW-1440/2026] petitioner could be affected if any order or decree is passed in the said suit.
3. Heard.
4. It is well settled law that the plaintiff is dominus litis. He could not be compelled to contest suit against any particular person if he has already chosen to file a suit against particular person.
5. Therefore, this Court finds no error so as to call for any interference in the impugned order dated 19.08.2025 under its writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed. However, if any decree is passed, thanb the same will not be binding on the petitioner.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/KRATIKA/30