APHC010048512026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 383/2026 Between: 1. POLINENI VENKATA VARAPRASAD, S/O SRINIVASARAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 24-4- 134/A, GADDAMVARIKOSTALU, KANDUKUR VILLAGE, KANDUKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER,AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, WORKING AS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, ,THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, R/O SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. HIMANSHU SHUKLA IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, WORKING AS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. LAVANYA, W/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, WORKING AS TAHSILDHAR, KANDUKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for committing Contempt of Court by wilfully disobeying /violating Final Order dated 16.10.2025 of this Hon'ble Court passed by the Hon'ble Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao in WP.No.28540/2025.and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARATH SIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.383 of 2026 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 16.10.2025, disposed of W.P.No.22967 of 2025, directing the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s application vide application No.FMC250924028350 dated 24.09.2025, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that respondent authorities have consider the petitioner’s application and rejected the claim of the petitioner vide endorsement dated 20.11.2025. At this juncture, learned counsel for petitioner sought liberty to challenge the endorsement dated 20.11.2025 passed by the respondents. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to petitioner to challenge the endorsement dated 20.11.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.03.2026 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.383 of 2026 06.03.2026 M MHH 5