Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16042 (RAJ)

RAVI KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI MURARILAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/406/2026 · 2026-01-29

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4179] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 406/2026 1. Ravi Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Murarilal Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o- Village Sindoli, Tehsil Kundal, Dis- trict Dausa. 2. Vishal Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Nemichand Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o- Village Mahua, Post Mahua, District Dausa. 3. Shubham Sharma S/o Shri Rajendra Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o-Lalpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa. 4. Shambhu Dayal Sharma Alias Sunil Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Chiranji Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o-Vil- lage Prempura, Post Bhateri, Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur. 5. Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Goverdhan Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o-Village Rajpura Patalwas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 6. Krishan Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Sitaram Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o-Village Mohanpura, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa. 7. Shankar Sharma Alias Kuntal S/o Shri Ramawatar Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o-Village Mohanpura, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa. 8. Manohar Lal Sharma S/o Shri Siyaram Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o- Village Dadanka, Post Chordi, Tehsil Sainthal, District Dausa. 9. Ankit Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Mukesh Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o- Village Madhopura, Tehsil Kotkhawada, District Jaipur. 10. Vishnu Sharma S/o Shri Harinarayan Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o- Village Jeetawala, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor 2. Gyandeep Kumawat S/o Shri Nankishore Kumawat, aged about 32 Years, R/o- Plot No.111, Muktanand Nagar, Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur. [2026:RJ-JP:4179] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-406/2026] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Pancholy with Mr. Akanksha Pancholy For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.539/2023 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341 & 147 of IPC, on the basis of compromise. 2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the respective parties, the material made available for perusal, especially considering the fact that parties [2026:RJ-JP:4179] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-406/2026] have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.539/2023 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /128