Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1604 (UTT)

SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1074/2024 · 2026-01-08

Registrar Judicial

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:368 SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1074 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner even in the revised call. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned counsel for Respondent No. 3. 4. Mr. D.S. Patni, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for Respondent No. 4. 5. Ms. Arushi Batra, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the CBI/Respondent No. 6. 6. Post-lunch, the matter is taken up again and, as per the order-sheet dated 11.12.2025, it has been observed by this Court that the learned counsel for the Petitioner was busy in another Court. 7. Since there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner, and neither any application nor any oral or written request for adjournment has been moved, the present Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 08.01.2026 Shiksha 2026:UHC:368