Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010051402026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/567/2026 SHILPIRANI DEB @ SHILPI DEB AND ANR W/O - LATE ASHIT DEB, R/O - VILL.- DUTTAPUR, P.O-MARJATKANDI P.S - BADARPUR, DIST.- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN -788701 2: RAHI DEB @S RAJ DEB S/O - LATE ASHIT DEB R/O - VILL. DUTTAPUR P.O- MARJATKANDI P.S - BADARPUR DIST. - SRIBHUMI ASSAM PIN - 788701 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : Abdul Rahman, P. SYLLIANG,MR. S. SUR,MR. J RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 27.03.2026 Page No.# 2/3 1. Heard Mr. S. Sur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Shilpirani Deb @ Shilpi Deb and Rahi Deb @ Raj Deb, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Badarpur P.S. Case No. 175/2025, registered under Section 189(2)/191(2)/191(3)/190/329(3)/295/74/117 (2)/118(2)/109/103(2) of BNS, 2023. 3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR is about the accused persons attacking the members of the informant’s side in a group, causing serious assault, grievous injuries and death of one person. 4. It is fairly submitted that an earlier bail petition was rejected on 6.02.2026 in AB 2664 of 2025 which was preferred by nine petitioners including the present two petitioners after perusal of case diary. 5. I have perused the reasons enumerated in the said decision rejecting the bail petition. The case diary was called for and is received along with a bail objection. 6. In the bail objection, the IO has contended that investigation has revealed the involvement of accused persons including these petitioners in the alleged offenses and there are materials to indicate that earlier also these persons were involved in activities pertaining to breach of peace but because of their unruly conduct people were afraid to file FIR. 7. The severe injuries on the victim was noticed in the earlier order and severe head injuries was sustained by the victim who had as per the Page No.# 3/3 investigation, come to the place of occurrence to stop the quarrel but he was assaulted by the accused persons. 8. Though, I have not found much investigation after the date of last rejection, nevertheless, considering the materials available and the reasons for rejection of the earlier bail petition, it would not be possible at this stage to take a different view in the subsequent bail petition in favour of the petitioners. 9. Accordingly, this bail petition also stands rejected. 10. Return back to case diary. .. JUDGE Comparing Assistant