HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1560/2026 M/s Technocrats Engineers And Consultants Private Limited, Resident Of Bl-2, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088, Also Concerned With Riico Plot No. G-97, Industrial Area, Shahjahanpur, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan Through Director Mukesh Rajotia Son Of Late Shri Om Prakash Rajotia, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Resident Of Bl-2, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088, ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Limited (Riico), Through Its Chairman-Cum- Managing Director, Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Riico Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005 3. The Unit Head, Riico Unit Ghiloth Camp/shahjahanpur Industrial Area, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan- 301706. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alamine For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 12/02/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks liberty to file appeal against the order dated 19.08.2025 before the Appellate Authority under the RIICO Disposal of Land Rules, 1979. Learned counsel also submits that immediately after passing of the impugned order dated 19.08.2025, a detailed (2 of 2) [CW-1560/2026] representation dated 26.08.2025 was submitted by him, however, till date, no decision upon the same has been taken by the respondents. Taking note of the above facts, the Court deems it fit and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under the RIICO Disposal of Land Rules, 1979, before the Appellate Authority. In the event of any such appeal being filed by the petitioner, the Appellate Authority is expected to decide the same expeditiously by passing a speaking and reasoned order after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Needless to say that this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s appeal and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the appeal in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /05