{ 2026:JHHC:16723 } IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5045 of 2026 ------ Apurva Ketan @ Gaurav Mishra, aged about 25 years, Son of Kailash Mishra, resident of 7LF, Quarter No. 17/12, new Housing Colony, Near M.P. Tower, Adityapur, P.O.+P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikella, Kharsawan, 831013. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Prakhar, Advocate. Mr. Krishna Murari Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Fahal Allam, A.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-10-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant by firing upon him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused-Rishi Pandey @ Prakash Pandey and even the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused-Rishi Pandey @ Prakash Pandey. It is next submitted that no one has sustained injury from firing. It is further submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by the co- ordinate bench of this court in B.A. No.4823 of 2026 vide order dated 02.06.2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.04.2026 as mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/06/2026 Amar/