IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11944 of 2026 Decided on: 17.07.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daulat Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of HP and Ors . .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr Naresh K Tomar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: “(i) That the respondent No. 2 to 4 may kindly be directed to adjudicate the representation/application i.e. Annexure P-3 to Annexure P-5 in accordance with the provision of the Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954 as well as provision contain in Chapter IX under Section 122 to 135 in Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954, which has been moved by the petitioner in partition proceedings before Learned Tehsildar Dadahu, District Sirmour, H.P. and before 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 respondent No. 2 and 3 with regard to inaction of respondent No. 4. ii) That the respondents may also be directed to give opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well to produced all relevant record to establish his rights with regard to the village common land in partition proceedings vide Partition Case No.08/09 of 2024 being carried out by respondent No. 4 with respect to village common land partition of Revenue village Chhau-Bhogar, Tehsil Dadahu, District Sirmour, H.P. which are in progress before the respondent No. 4.” 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition does not contain adequate pleadings, to substantiate the grievance of the petitioner. Necessary documents have also inadvertently not been placed on record, therefore, petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition in accordance with law after incorporating necessary pleadings and supporting documents. 3. Granting such liberty, present writ petition to stand dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 17, 2026 Judge R.Atal