APHC010051232023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2790/2023 Between: 1. KANCHARLA CHINNA SESHAIAH,, S/O.CHANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT .- 35YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O 1- 125, BADVEEDU VILLAGE, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I.DIVISION, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.R.I. SUB DIVISION, Y PALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. THE BADVEEDUGRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY- CUM- PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. THE SARPANCH, BADVEEDU GRAM PANCHAYAT, PEDDARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the funds amountingRs4,72,868/-, Rs 2,49,530/- and Rs 92,371/- and Rs 91,534/-Totaling Rs 9,06,303/-to the petitioner under SDF Granttowards cost of the material supplied by the petitioner for the works 1)Construction of CC Road from Gumma Pullaiah (H) to PR Road in Badveedu Village and Gram Panchayath of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 2)Construction of CC Road from Ramalayam to Water tank in Pragallapadu Village of Badveedu Gram Panchayath in Peddaraveedu Mandal, 3)Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony west portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 4)Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony east portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and UnConstituional and consequently direct the respondents to release funds amounting Rs4,72,868/-, Rs 2,49,530/- Rs 92,371/-and 91,534/- Totaling Rs 9,06,303/-to 3 the petitioner under SDFGrants towards cost of the material supplied by the petitioner for the works 1)Construction of CC Road from Gumma Pullaiah (H) to PR Road in Badveedu Village and Gram Panchayath of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 2)Construction of CC Road from Ramalayam to Water tank in Pragallapadu Village of Badveedu Gram Panchayath in Peddaraveedu Mandal, 3)Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony west portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 4)Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony east portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consequently direct the respondents to release funds amountingRs4,72,868/-, Rs 2,49,530/- Rs92,371 and Rs 91,534/-Totaling Rs 9,06,303/-to the petitioner under SDFGrants towards cost of the material supplied by the petitioner for the works 1) Construction of CC Road from Gumma Pullaiah (H) to PR Road in Badveedu Village and Gram Panchayath of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 2) Construction of CC Road from Ramalayam to Water tank in Pragallapadu Village of Badveedu Gram Panchayath in Peddaraveedu Mandal, 3) Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony west portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, 4) Providing internal CC Roads in Badveedu SC Colony east portion of Badveedu GP of Peddaraveedu Mandal, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRASANTHI GUDE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND 4 GRAM PANCHAYAT 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 4. G VENKATA REDDY 5. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following order: In spite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. On earlier occasion also i.e., on 16.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting with the case. 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05.01.2026 ANS 5 204 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2790/2023 Date: 05.01.2026 ANS