RAJU JANGID SON OF LT. SHRI SATYANARAYAN JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/381/2026 · 2026-01-22
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16025 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16025 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 381/2026 Raju Jangid Son Of Lt. Shri Satyanarayan Jangid, Resident Of 85, Shatabdi Nagar, India Gate, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Ramgopal Chaudhary Son Of Shri Chhitarmal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Kumhariyawas, Teh- Chaksu, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Vijay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Vijay Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 22/01/2026
1. Parties are present in person and they have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.309/2022 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits during the course of investigation, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
[2026:RJ-JP:3087] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-381/2026]
4.
Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.309/2022 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /156