Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17921 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
1. Aamir Khan S/O Kasim Khan R/O Village- Bhakurahar, P.S- Bairgania, Distt.- Sitamarhi. At present R/O H.No. 256, Jhuggi Block-G, Jahangir Puri, Adarsh Nagar, North West Delhi, N.S. Mandi Delhi.
2. Md. Mallik Mia @ Kaushar Mallik @ Kausher Malik S/O Mohammad Khurshid Alam R/O Village- Fulwariya, P.S- Dhaka, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aditya Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Renuka Ratanakar (App125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 for the offence punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 01.01.2026 at 4:30 P.M., he came out of Disney land along with his nephew, when Md. Amir and Md. Mallik started assaulting him and Kasim tied a rope around his neck and Aamir pressed his private part and another accused snatched
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17921 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 his chain and Rs. 3,500/-.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that police during the course of investigation has given notice under section 35(3) BNSS to the petitioners since police decided not to arrest the petitioners for the present, as such, the petitioners presently do not have any apprehension of arrest hence seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file afresh, if need arises.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sanjeev/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T