1 89.WP.57.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 57 OF 2025 RAVIRAJ NATTHU PAGAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Bhalerao Patil AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. V.M. Kagne Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Amol Vasmatkar ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 29.09.2026 PER COURT: 1. Learned advocate for respondent No.4 submits that the benefits of the Seventh Pay Commission are already given to the petitioners. Hence, the prayer clause ‘B’ does not survive. He further submits that the only grievance that remains is with regard to payment of HRA and transportation allowance, which is the responsibility of the State Government. 2. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of by directing respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 05.11.2024, on its own merits, and in accordance with the policy, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/ 2026:BHC-AUG:46128-DB