Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16020 (MAD)

D.JAMBU v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP/12436/2026 · 2026-04-06

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 12436 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 12436 of 2026 D.Jambu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration 100,santhome High Road chennai-600 028 2. The District Registrar (Administration) The District Registrar office Ranipet District 3. The Sub Registrar O/o.The Sub Registrar office Arakkonam 4. Prakash Babu 5. Munirattinam 6. Hari ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 16.02.2026 objection from registering the document in Survey No.16/8 to an extent of 0.40 cents, situated at Ananthapuram village, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District expeditiously in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish for R1 to R3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12436 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that due to an inadvertent mistake, the property belonging to the petitioner has been included in the UDR patta issued to the respondents 4 to 6. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the third respondent shall not register any document pertaining to the petitioner’s property. The petitioner has already filed a protest petition before the third respondent opposing for registration of the document in respect of the subject property. 2. Mr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, and on instructions, submits that the third respondent shall hear the petitioner before taking a final decision as to whether any document presented by the respondents 4 to 6 pertaining to the subject property can be registered or not. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also satisfied with the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate for the official respondents. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to issue notice to the petitioner as and when any document is presented for registration by any of the private respondents, namely, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12436 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 respondents 4 to 6, pertaining to the subject property, and only after hearing the objections of the petitioner and after giving due consideration to the same, the third respondent is permitted to register any document presented by any of the private respondents for registration. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 6, notice to them in this writ petition is dispensed with by this Court. No Costs. 06-04-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To 1. The Inspector General of Registration 100,santhome High Road chennai-600 028 2. The District Registrar (Administration) The District Registrar office Ranipet District 3. The Sub Registrar O/o.The Sub Registrar office Arakkonam https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12436 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM WP No. 12436 of 2026 06-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis