1 2026:CGHC:5239-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 65 of 2026 Ramesh Kumar Jain S/o Late Hiralal Jain, aged about 58 years, R/o Navkar Parisar, near Pulgaon Naka, Durg , Station, Tehsil and District Durg Chhattisgarh.(Plaintiff) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Ashish S/o Mohan Lal Sharma, aged about 40 years, R/o Gaya Nagar, near Rajput Kirana Stores, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 2 - Abhishek (Deleted) as per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 09-03-2022 and 05- 04-2022. 3 - Savitri D/o Mohan Lal Sharma, aged about 55 years, R/o Gaya Nagar, near Rajput Kirana Stores, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 4 - Karuna D/o Mohan Lal Sharma aged about 43 years, R/o Gaya Nagar, near Rajput Kirana Stores, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 5 - Smt. Gitabai W/o Mohan Lal Sharma, aged about 75 years, R/o Gaya Nagar , near Rajput Kirana Stores, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU 2 6 - Bholanath S/o Loknath Sharma, aged about 55 years, R/o Brahmin Para, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 7 - Champa Bai W/o Ramsnehi Sharma, aged about 60 years, through Power of Attorney Holder Bholanath S/o Loknath Sharma, aged about 55 years, R/o Brahmin Para, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 8 - Kashinath S/o Loknath Sharma, aged about 51 years, R/o Brahmin Para, Station Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 9 - Vardhaman Builders and Developers Station Road Durg, through its Partner Uttam Chand Surana, aged about 45 years , R/o Navkar Katpis Farishta Complex , Station Road Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). 10 - State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Collectorate, Durg, Tehsil and District Durg (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System.) For Petitioner : Ms. Shristi Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate. For State : Mr. Avinash Singh, G.A. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, J. Order on Board Per Rajani Dubey, J. 30.01.2026 1. This is an office reference. 2. The matter is listed for orders on PUD dated 08.01.2026 received from the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Durg (C.G.) which has been endorsed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, District Durg (C.G.) requesting for extension of more time for 3 proper disposal of the pending case ( F.A. No. 89/2020). 3. On 05.03.2025, this Court had directed the trial Court to expedite and conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a period of 03 months. 4. By the PUD under consideration, the concerned trial Court has prayed for further time for deciding the aforesaid case. 5. As the request made by the concerned Court appears to be genuine and, therefore, additional three months’ time is granted from the next date of hearing of the case to ensure disposal of the case. 6. The concerned Judge is directed to make all the endeavour for disposal of the case within time. Registry is directed to send the copy of this order to the concerned Court and also to the concerned District Judge. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge U.K. Raju